{"id":2623,"date":"2011-04-12T15:19:40","date_gmt":"2011-04-12T19:19:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.unionvilletimes.com\/?p=2623"},"modified":"2011-04-12T15:19:40","modified_gmt":"2011-04-12T19:19:40","slug":"unionville-board-leans-against-increasing-tax-hike","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.unionvilletimes.com\/?p=2623","title":{"rendered":"Unionville board leans against increasing tax hike"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><em><strong><span style=\"font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;\">Boosting tax rate from 1.0% to 1.4% would mean about $20 increase; social workers, guidance and librarians could be in crosshairs instead<\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;\"><strong>By Mike McGann<\/strong>, <span style=\"font-size: x-small;\"><em>Editor, UnionvilleTimes.com<\/em><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_2624\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.unionvilletimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/04\/twnetybucks.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2624\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-2624 \" style=\"border: 2px solid navy; margin: 4px;\" title=\"twnetybucks\" src=\"http:\/\/www.unionvilletimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/04\/twnetybucks-300x262.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"262\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-2624\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">An average propety taxpayer in the Unionville-Chadds Ford School District would see about $20 of additional taxes if the board were to boost the tax rate to the state&#39;s Act  maximum. Right now, a narrow majority appears to be opposed to that move.<\/p><\/div>\n<p>EAST MARLBOROUGH \u2014 The Unionville-Chadds Ford Board of Education needs to find about $1.1 million in budget cuts after proposed state cuts in funding, but it seems likely none of those funds will come from increasing local taxes.<\/p>\n<p>During Monday night\u2019s joint board Finance Committee meeting and board worksession, the eight board members in attendance split 4-4 over passing some \u2014 $213,087 of the deficit \u2014 onto district taxpayers by raising taxes to the full limits as allowed by Act 1, roughly 1.4% percent, as opposed to the previously approved approximate 1.0% in Chester County (the increase tax rate for Chadds Ford Township residents will be around 5% because of changes to Delaware County property values; in 2010 Delaware County taxpayers saw a lower increase than Chester County residents).<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>And while the personnel cuts being bandied about range from social workers to guidance counselors and even school librarians, plus a number of lesser used academic programs, a majority of the board seems resistant to passing any additional cost onto taxpayers \u2014 although initially it seemed as if the board had a 4-4 deadlock.<\/p>\n<p>However, immediately after the open meeting \u2014 as the board planned to meet in private session to discuss labor talks and legal issues, Corrine Sweeney, who had been traveling, arrived and said she supported keeping the rate at 1.0%, giving the lower rate a 5-4 margin, at least in theory \u2014 as two members supporting the status quo made it clear they might change their minds.<\/p>\n<p>During the meeting, it became evident that the board was very evenly split \u2014 and that what might be a 5-4 margin on support of keeping the rate at 1.0% could be shaky and even disappear before it comes up for a vote at the April 25 formal Board of Education meeting.<\/p>\n<p>While there were less specifics than at last month\u2019s special Finance Committee meeting where there might be cuts, Superintendent of Schools Sharon Parker made it clear that it would likely take staff reductions to make the numbers work \u2014 especially without a tax increase.<\/p>\n<p>While Knauss made it clear he wants to stay at 1.0%, the impact of that decision seemed to weigh on a number of board members \u2014 especially as the cuts are coming because Gov. Tom Corbett surprised virtually everyone with a proposed $612,000 cut in reimbursement for FICA (Federal Insurance Contributions Act) payroll deductions in addition to expected losses of state funding that came from expiring federal stimulus funds.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cOn a tax parcel paying $5,000 in taxes, we\u2019re talking about $20 more,\u201d board member Jeff Leiser said. \u201cI\u2019m sorry, to me, 1.4% sounds reasonable.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think we all agreed 1% with the idea that we would have any major cuts from the state,\u201d board member Eileen Bushelow said. \u201cAt this point, I support going to the cap.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Agreeing with Knauss, Paul Price suggested that the district needed to get used to new austerity and that things will get even worse.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe will need to do more cuts that this in the coming years,\u201d Price said.<\/p>\n<p>But Jeff Helrung argued that Price\u2019s argument was actually the best in favor of taking the full tax increase, suggesting that taking the lower number will reverberate for years, as each year\u2019s maximum tax rate is based over the previous year\u2019s budget and the higher number would give the district the most options in the years to come.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cTo have less than 20% of the lost funding come from the taxpayers seems fair,\u201d he said. \u201cDr. Price\u2019s argument underscores that \u2014 just because we know things will get worse, we need to keep our base up, to give us a buffer for the storms to come.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Board president Timotha Trigg said she was leaning toward keeping the rate at 1.0%, while board Vice President Frank Murphy expressed support to keep it there, but said \u201cI can\u2019t say I\u2019m rock solid.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Trigg also noted that there are \u201ca lot of questions, here\u201d about what the state will really do in terms of the funding. In terms of the FICA reimbursement, Corbett will need to get legislation through making the change in the formula \u2014 and sources in both the Republican and Democratic legislative caucuses suggest that it faces an uphill climb, unless enough mandate relief can be passed to offset the loss of revenue \u2014 various changes in state laws that place requirements on school districts without paying for them, such as requiring school districts to bus students to our-of-state private schools, which currently costs Unionville more than $200,000 a year.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile the hunt for cuts continues, with the budget expected to be the focus of a town hall style meeting Thursday night at Unionville High School. More than 140 people have already registered to attend the event \u2014 and each person wanting to speak will be allowed about two minutes to say their piece on the budget \u2014 a major departure from last year\u2019s more conversational, round table event.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Boosting tax rate from 1.0% to 1.4% would mean about $20 increase; social workers, guidance and librarians could be in crosshairs instead By Mike McGann, Editor, UnionvilleTimes.com EAST MARLBOROUGH \u2014 The Unionville-Chadds Ford Board of Education needs to find about $1.1 million in budget cuts after proposed state cuts in funding, but it seems likely [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2624,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,7,16],"tags":[113,181,69,44,24],"class_list":["post-2623","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","category-featured","category-schools","tag-2011-budget","tag-corbett","tag-legislature","tag-school-board","tag-unionville"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unionvilletimes.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2623","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unionvilletimes.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unionvilletimes.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unionvilletimes.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unionvilletimes.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2623"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.unionvilletimes.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2623\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unionvilletimes.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/2624"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unionvilletimes.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2623"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unionvilletimes.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2623"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unionvilletimes.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2623"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}